Site icon المفوضية المصرية للحقوق والحريات

Freedom of Belief and Citizenship Bulletin July 2025 Highlights

july31, 2025

The Egyptian Commission for Rights and Freedoms launches its special bulletin on “Freedom of Belief and Citizenship”, aiming to shed light on the concerns and problems of minorities, promote a culture of tolerance, reject violence and hate speech, and uphold the values of citizenship. In this issue, the Commission highlights the most significant developments and violations related to freedom of belief and citizenship during the month of July 2025.

The 2014 Constitution guarantees protections for the freedom of religion or belief, including articles 53, 64, and 235. Additionally, the Penal Code introduced a dedicated section addressing such crimes under a new title: Misdemeanors Related to Religions and Combating Discrimination, according to Law No. 126 of 2011, issued on 15/10/2011 during the rule of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces. This law added a new article prohibiting discrimination among citizens and criminalizing such behavior. The section consists of three articles that criminalize acts of violence against any religious belief and fully protect citizens’ right to freely practice their religious rituals in accordance with their beliefs.

Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights stipulates:
“In those States in which ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities exist, persons belonging to such minorities shall not be denied the right, in community with the other members of their group, to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practise their own religion, or to use their own language.”

The United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech (2019) defines hate speech as communication that “attacks or uses pejorative or discriminatory language with reference to a person or a group on the basis of who they are—in other words, based on their religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, color, descent, gender or other identity factor.”

The Egyptian Constitution, in Article 53, affirms that incitement to hatred is a crime punishable by law. It states:

“Citizens are equal before the law. They are equal in rights, freedoms, and public duties, without discrimination based on religion, belief, sex, origin, race, color, language, disability, social status, political or geographic affiliation, or any other reason. Discrimination and incitement to hatred are crimes punishable by law. The state shall take necessary measures to eliminate all forms of discrimination, and the law shall regulate the establishment of an independent commission for this purpose.”

Below are the most significant developments and violations observed in the field of “freedom of belief and citizenship”during the month of July 2025:

Freedom of Belief and Citizenship News:

The decision was made during the 47th session of the World Heritage Committee held at UNESCO headquarters in Paris, after reviewing the 2025 report by the joint Reactive Monitoring Mission of the World Heritage Centre and the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). The report highlighted the notable progress made in the preservation and safeguarding of the Abu Mena archaeological site, especially the establishment of an effective monitoring system for groundwater levels, which has proven successful through continuous periodic measurements.
The Abu Mena Monastery area is considered one of the most significant heritage sites with exceptional historical and cultural value. It was the second Christian pilgrimage destination after Jerusalem and has been listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1979 in recognition of its religious and architectural importance.
Among the most prominent archaeological and architectural discoveries at the Abu Mena site are the well containing the tomb of Saint Menas, the Great Church, and the Pilgrims’ Square—all of which reflect the site’s profound spiritual and architectural significance.

  1. Confronting religious extremism and terrorism in all its forms, by preparing imams capable of dismantling extremist ideology and delivering sound religious discourse.
  2. Combating irreligious extremism and destructive behaviors, by using sermons and lessons to address social phenomena such as addiction, suicide, and bullying.
  3. Rebuilding the Egyptian personality from both religious and national standpoints, to instill values of belonging, knowledge, openness, and trust in oneself and national institutions.
  4. Contributing to civilizational progress, by promoting scientific and creative awareness in society and encouraging youth toward discovery and invention.

Deliberations on Freedom of Belief and the Civil State:

He added that “the greater problem lies in the attempt to ‘religionize nationalism’ — that is, to tie patriotism and loyalty to the nation to religious reasons or motives, as if true loyalty can only be achieved through faith,” viewing this tendency as an inappropriate insertion of religion into domains where it does not belong.

Eissa explained that nations are legal entities that neither go to heaven nor hell, nor are they judged on the Day of Judgment. He affirmed that there is no such thing as a “Christian state” or an “Islamic state”; rather, there are states where the majority of the population adheres to a certain religion — whether Muslim, Christian, Jewish, or even atheist.
He concluded by saying: “The modern state is not built on religious affiliation, but on the social contract and citizenship. Reducing national belonging to religious belonging is dangerous — it is precisely what, for many years, paved the way for extremist currents to dominate the public sphere under the guise of false patriotism.”

 

Under the Microscope:

The MP added that the law relies on the general principles of Christianity rather than detailed legal codes, leading to varying interpretations among denominations. This has caused significant social issues over decades, including problems related to divorce, second marriages, and inheritance — all of which necessitate the prompt issuance of the law.
He noted that the 2014 Constitution granted Christians the right to refer to their own religious laws in personal status matters through Article 3, paving the way for this legislation. Previously, the matter was hindered by Article 2 of the Constitution, which identifies the principles of Islamic Sharia as the main source of legislation.

El-Bayadi concluded by emphasizing that the law represents an urgent humanitarian issue, not merely a legislative priority, pointing out that hundreds of families suffer due to the absence of a legal framework that would allow them to resolve their issues within the justice system.

In an open letter addressed to the UNESCO World Heritage Committee, the organization expressed concern about ongoing tourism and development projects around the monastery, describing them as “transforming the sacred landscape into a noisy commercial and tourist zone,” amid a clear failure by the Egyptian government to comply with international convention recommendations.

In an extensive report supported by documents and images, the organization pointed out that Egypt has not complied with the suspension of construction activities as previously requested by UNESCO, resulting in “severe damage to the site’s outstanding universal values.”
The organization’s president, Stephan Dömpke, stated: “Egypt continues to provide UNESCO with misleading or incomplete information. It is time for UNESCO to be clear: its patience is running out. The isolation and serenity of the area are among the core values that must be protected by all means.”

World Heritage Watch called for the current session of the World Heritage Committee to include the following in its resolutions: confirmation of the Greek Orthodox Church’s ownership of Saint Catherine’s Monastery and its properties; recognition of the real risks posed by development, transportation, and institutional changes; dispatching a joint UNESCO–ICOMOS monitoring mission within three months; and considering the site’s inscription on the “World Heritage in Danger” list if the mission is not carried out within the specified timeframe.

Violence Based on Belief and Hate Speech:

Ibrahim emphasized that one of the most alarming aspects of the incident was the use of the word “Christian” as an insult, which reflects a widespread condescending attitude toward Christian citizens in large sectors of society. He added that the official discourse by politicians and religious institutions promoting equality and coexistence has so far failed to create real change on the ground.

He pointed out that the Ministry of Education remained silent about the incident, as if it were not concerned, although a simple statement expressing its position and appreciating the teacher’s refusal to allow cheating could have sufficed. Ibrahim also criticized the Teachers’ Syndicate, accusing it of failing to defend one of its members, and even reportedly intervening to arrange a “reconciliation” between the assaulted teacher and the parents rather than offering her clear support.

Ibrahim also addressed what he described as a “highly conservative popular religiosity” that accommodates socially unacceptable behaviors such as cheating and lying. He argued that this culture fuels and justifies such incidents under the guise of superficial religiosity. He concluded by affirming that addressing such incidents requires genuine cultural and institutional reform, beginning with acknowledging the problem instead of ignoring or covering it up.

He explained that cheating has become a widespread social practice, with answer sheets being leaked and individuals helping students cheat during exams, alongside public calls for facilitating mass cheating. He added that this phenomenon is not new but has worsened over time, to the point that some students and parents now view it as a presumed right.

Fawzy pointed to the distortion of values in society, where cheating is seen as a form of “compassion,” while adherence to the rules is viewed as “cruelty.” He then addressed the sectarian aspect of the incident, emphasizing that the teacher was subjected to bullying, verbal abuse, and attacks based on her religious identity.

In her post, the teacher wrote:
“My dear students… next year, God willing, if you show up in class dressed like that, I will personally lock the door and pin your headscarf around your neck with a box of pins—the one you’re so happy about. Enjoy your summer vacation, sweethearts.”

The post sparked significant controversy, with some supporting the teacher’s stance and others criticizing it. In response to the backlash, the teacher said:
“Someone might say I have no right to control what they wear. Well, I do have the right. You wouldn’t be allowed into an opera house without formal attire.”

She added:
“Every workplace has a dress code—you can’t just show up however you like. These are my rules as an Arabic teacher. I’m not being harsh; the girls know I’m joking with them, and they love me for it.”

Regarding her educational mission, the teacher stated:
“I’m not perfect, and neither are they. But as a reminder—even if just a few years separate me from them—I’m a mentor before I am a teacher. God will hold me accountable not only for the lessons and grades, but also for their moral development and behavior.”

Exit mobile version